“Will Rothera’s event contract notional traded volume exceed $2 billion in November 2026?” Event Contract

ProphetX LLC · received by the CFTC 6 October 2026 · the filing (PDF)

Summary

Warrant Check read 4 operative provisions in this filing. Across them, 13 of 24 checks are present, 5 partial and 6 absent. 2 provisions have every check present. 1 statement the exchange makes to the CFTC about the filing itself (such as that it complies with the Act) is not contract terms and is left out. 1 rule on who may trade is not a settlement term and is left out.

13 present5 partial6 absent

What the wording addresses

Settlement Criteria (Yes/No determination) — every check present.
“Resolves to "Yes" if the Reference Volume exceeds $2,000,000,000”
Change in Publication (void on data disruption): Relevant Timeline.
“all orders on the Contract shall be void”
Corrections and Restatements (finality of computation) — every check present.
“does not affect the Reference Volume, the Market Outcome, or settlement”

What the wording leaves open

Change in Publication (void on data disruption) “all orders on the Contract shall be void”
- Independent Verification — Partial: Unavailability of named sources is checkable, but 'materially changes' and 'unequivocally determined' are judged by the Exchange itself rather than a named neutral party or document.
- Suitable Method — Partial: Sequential checking of named sources can establish non-availability, but the qualitative judgment of 'material change' or 'unequivocal' determination is not capable of the certainty the clause implies.
- Defined Benchmark — Absent: No defined threshold for what counts as a 'material' change or what makes an outcome 'unequivocally' determined.
- Conclusive Link — Absent: no named standard - entailment cannot be assessed
- Comprehensive Coverage — Partial: Coverage is tied to the Reference Period's Settlement Reference Sources, but the alternate-source cascade's completeness relative to the full population is not fully specified.
What would close it: Define an objective threshold or named third-party confirmation for 'material change' and 'unequivocally determined' rather than leaving it to the Exchange's own judgment.
Absence of Data (void provision) “cannot reasonably determine the outcome of the Contract”
- Independent Verification — Absent: Rests on the Exchange's own assessment of what it can 'reasonably determine,' not a named document, test, or third-party-receivable proof.
- Suitable Method — Absent: 'Reasonably determine' is a subjective capability judgment, not a checkable procedure; it cannot support a hard binary trigger of this kind.
- Defined Benchmark — Absent: No threshold or defined standard of reasonableness is given.
- Conclusive Link — Absent: no named standard - entailment cannot be assessed
- Comprehensive Coverage — Partial: Appears tied to the Contract's settlement sources generally but no explicit population/coverage is defined for this fallback.
- Relevant Timeline — Partial: No explicit cutoffis stated for this fallback beyond implicit reliance on the Determination Cutoffcontext.
What would close it: Replace 'cannot reasonably determine' with an objective, named failure condition (e.g., absence of data from all three listed sources by a stated time).

Every provision read

Settlement Criteria (Yes/No determination)

“Resolves to "Yes" if the Reference Volume exceeds $2,000,000,000”

Determination: Reference Volume, as computed from the Settlement Reference Source formula, exceeds $2,000,000,000 · Consequence: Contract resolves Yes (payout $1.00 to Yes side) or No (nothing)

Present Independent Verification. Evidence is Rothera's publicly published volume/open-interest data and end-of-day files, a named third-party-reportable source, not the Exchange's own opinion.

Present Suitable Method. Reference Volume is itself defined as the output of the stated formula applied to the named source, so the procedure establishes the claim exactly as asserted, with no gap between method and assertion.

Present Defined Benchmark. A precise numeric threshold ($2,000,000,000) is named, measured to the dollar.

Present Conclusive Link. Because Reference Volume is defined by the formula itself, computing a figure above the threshold directly and necessarily establishes the Yes outcome as defined.

Present Comprehensive Coverage. The claim's population (Reference Volume) is defined coextensively with the Settlement Reference Source's reported population for the period; no broader population is asserted despite the disclaimer that it is not an estimate of Rothera's total trading activity.

Present Relevant Timeline. Reference Period is precisely delimited (trade dates Nov 1-30, 2026 sessions) and matches the period the claim covers.

Change in Publication (void on data disruption)

“all orders on the Contract shall be void”

Determination: Rothera's publication ceases/materially changes such that Reference Volume cannot be determined from any Settlement Reference Source and the Market Outcome has not been unequivocally determined · Consequence: All orders void; collateral returned to applicable accounts

Partial Independent Verification. Unavailability of named sources is checkable, but 'materially changes' and 'unequivocally determined' are judged by the Exchange itself rather than a named neutral party or document.

Partial Suitable Method. Sequential checking of named sources can establish non-availability, but the qualitative judgment of 'material change' or 'unequivocal' determination is not capable of the certainty the clause implies.

Absent Defined Benchmark. No defined threshold for what counts as a 'material' change or what makes an outcome 'unequivocally' determined.

Absent Conclusive Link. no named standard - entailment cannot be assessed

Partial Comprehensive Coverage. Coverage is tied to the Reference Period's Settlement Reference Sources, but the alternate-source cascade's completeness relative to the full population is not fully specified.

Present Relevant Timeline. Applies during/after the same Reference Period and up to the Determination Cutoff, consistent with the obligation's period.

Absence of Data (void provision)

“cannot reasonably determine the outcome of the Contract”

Determination: ProphetX cannot reasonably determine the outcome of the Contract · Consequence: All orders on that Contract void; collateral returned

Absent Independent Verification. Rests on the Exchange's own assessment of what it can 'reasonably determine,' not a named document, test, or third-party-receivable proof.

Absent Suitable Method. 'Reasonably determine' is a subjective capability judgment, not a checkable procedure; it cannot support a hard binary trigger of this kind.

Absent Defined Benchmark. No threshold or defined standard of reasonableness is given.

Absent Conclusive Link. no named standard - entailment cannot be assessed

Partial Comprehensive Coverage. Appears tied to the Contract's settlement sources generally but no explicit population/coverage is defined for this fallback.

Partial Relevant Timeline. No explicit cutoffis stated for this fallback beyond implicit reliance on the Determination Cutoffcontext.

Corrections and Restatements (finality of computation)

“does not affect the Reference Volume, the Market Outcome, or settlement”

Determination: The data published by the Settlement Reference Source as of the Determination Cutoffis the final basis for Reference Volume · Consequence: Later corrections/restatements do not change the Reference Volume, Market Outcome, or settlement; no resettlement occurs

Present Independent Verification. Evidence is the same named, publicly available Rothera publication/data files as of a fixed, objectively ascertainable time.

Present Suitable Method. A time-stamped snapshot of named published data can establish a 'final as of cutoff' figure with the precision the clause asserts.

Present Defined Benchmark. The Determination Cutoff (5:00 p.m. ET, second business day after last trade date) is a precisely named temporal standard.

Present Conclusive Link. Data published by the defined cutofftime, by definition, constitutes the final Reference Volume under this clause.

Present Comprehensive Coverage. Covers the full Reference Period's reported sessions as captured in the snapshot.

Present Relevant Timeline. The cutofftiming matches and bounds the obligation's own defined determination window.

Read 31 October 2026 with Warrant Check (instrument 1.0). Labels: Present, Partial, Absent describe whether each check is found in the wording as written.

Check your own contract terms with Warrant Check →

← All filings in the monitor